Over the last 15 years Microsoft has gone from 2 friends in a dorm room to the most
highly capitalized company in the United States. This has occurred not because of luck,
money, acquisitions, or personal connections. It has
occurred solely because Bill Gates has built a company with his own unique management
style. Microsoft's management style is it's core strength. There are other companies that
produce better software, market better, and make fewer mistakes. But no other company
manages their business as well. And Microsoft's management strength is why it will
continue to dominate.
The software industry is littered with the carcasses of companies that Microsoft has
put out of business. Microsoft's strength directly or indirectly threatens every company
on the globe - including yours. If Microsoft goes directly after your company's business,
your company can, at best, hold on to part of it's former market. At worst it will have to
close it's doors.
Microsoft has brought about a change in the business community greater than the change
due to global competition that has occurred over the last 20 years. This new change is
more severe. It requires a change in the mind-set
of every manager and employee in your company. Because Microsoft does have every employee
100% focused on taking your market away. And if Microsoft has not set it's sights on your
markets, there will be companies that have learned a lot from Microsoft that will go after
your markets. Other companies are learning from Microsoft and are using these lessons to
dominate every market.
In fact, a Bill Gates would never get promoted to a senior position in the average
large company. Someone so nakedly aggressive would be recognized as way too dangerous and
the entire herd would ensure his demise.
Microsoft's strength directly or indirectly threatens every company on the globe. If
Microsoft sets it's sights on another company's business, that company can, at best, hold
on to part of it's former market. At worst, it
will have to close it's doors.
Every Microsoft employee knows in their gut what their primary goal is. And that is to
win 100% of whatever market they are going after. The unofficial but clear corporate motto
is - "Total World Domination."
Microsoft is very comfortable losing money year after year to keep going after
strategic markets.
They consistently attempt to hire people who are in the smartest 5%...
Microsoft announced that they were cutting a billion dollars from their R&D budget
because they could not hire enough good people. They did this rather than hire from the
second 5%.
Very few companies are willing to bet their future unless they have no choice. Even
though they don't need to bet the company, Microsoft chooses to do so, and truly does do
so, year in and year out. And doing so is taken for granted.
As soon as a Microsoft product owns a market, Microsoft starts looking at how to
eliminate it with a better product. They killed DOS with Windows. They are trying to
replace Windows with Internet Explorer.
In 9 months Microsoft went from having no Internet strategy to being an
Internet-focused company. And at the time of this writing, it's pretty much over for
Netscape. Could any other Fortune 500 company change course 180°
? in 9 months? Or even in 9 years?
At most large businesses, to succeed is good but to fail is unacceptable. What happens
if you fail at your company? Odds are, it's a major problem for your career. At Microsoft,
failures are expected and as long as they are not exceedingly stupid, they are basically
forgotten. And success is required.
When a manager and an employee disagree at Microsoft, it's not pre-determined who will
win the disagreement.
The primary qualification for managers at Microsoft is their expertise within a
particular field. Management and people skills are of secondary importance.
Ok, so you created a new business unit, entered a new market segment, and dominated it.
So what? That was yesterday. What are you going to do for me today?
When success is the only measure, then excuses become irrelevant. And at Microsoft
success is what they measure things by.
Never, never try to bullshit the employees. Employees are smart and know when they are
being fed a line.
When a job at Microsoft absolutely, positively needed five people to complete it, four
would be assigned... But if there are never enough people available, there is no one
sitting around to create a make-work job. The giant savings here is not the direct salary
cost of people doing nothing. The savings is the lack of bureaucracy imposed by people
trying to create work for themselves.
Microsoft is not a single, large company, rather it is a collection of small,
independent companies. Virtually all job creation, technical innovation and exceptional
productivity in the U.S. economy comes from or is found in small companies. If Microsoft
continues to operate as a small company internally, then it can continue to grow at the
rate of a small company.